The Dynamical Systems Approach to Cognitive Science
Maurice Grinberg
Central and East European Centre for Cognitive Science
New Bulgarian University
Course description
This course
introduces the students to the dynamical systems theory and its use and
influence in cognitive science. The basic concepts, terminology and methods of
this approach will be presented and discussed from the general perspective of
what a theory explaining the human cognitive processes should be. The
presentation will be based on comparison with the symbolic and connectionist
approaches.
During the
afternoon sessions, several examples of models, taken from different fields of
cognitive science, based on the dynamical systems approach will be discussed in
detail.
Lecture 1: Theories and models in cognitive
science: symbolic, connectionist and dynamical system approaches. Main
requirements for a theory of cognition and the importance of models and
simulations in cognitive science. [html]
Readings:
- Port, R. F. & van Gelder, T.
(eds.) (1995).
It’s About Time: An Overview of the Dynamical Approach of Cognition. [html,
excerpts][pdf]
In Port, R. F. & van Gelder, T. (eds.) (1995). Mind as Motion: Exploration in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- van Gelder,
T. J. (1999). Dynamic approaches to cognition.
In R. Wilson & F. Keil ed., The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 244-6. [pdf]
- Chapter 1: Representation and
computation. In Thagard, P. (1996). Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science.
MA: MIT Press.
- Peschl,
M. F. (2004). Cognition, Simulation,
and Cognitive Science Constructing Knowledge and Synthesizing (Cognitive) Models. (in preparation)
- van Gelder, T. J. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in
cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-14. [pdf]
- Port,
R. (in press). The dynamical systems hypothesis in cognitive
science. MacMillan Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science.
Amy Lockyer, Assoc. Editor. [pdf]
Lecture 2: The dynamical system approach in
cognitive science: The dynamical hypothesis. Comparison with the symbolic and
connectionist approaches. [html]
Readings:
- van Gelder, T. (1999)
Revisiting the Dynamical Hypothesis. Preprint No. 2/99, University
of Melbourne, Department of
Philosophy. [pdf]
- Bates, E. A. & Elman, J. L. (2002). Connectionism And
The Study Of Change.
In Mark Johnson (Ed.), Brain development and cognition: A reader (2nd
ed.). Oxford: Blackwell
Publishers. [pdf]
- Bechtel, W. (1997). Dynamics and
Decomposition: Are They Compatible? Proceedings of the Australian Cognitive Science Society. [html]
- Bechtel, W. (1997). Representations and
Cognitive Explanations:
Assessing the Dynamicist's Challenge in Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science 22, 295-318 [html]
- French, R. M. &
Thomas, E. (2001). The
Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science: A review essay of Mind As Motion. Minds and Machines 11, 101-111.
- Beer,
R.D. (2000). Dynamical
approaches to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(3):91-99.
- Chapter 8: Review and
evaluation and Dynamic Systems and
& Chapter 11: Mathematical Knowledge. In Thagard,
P. (1996). Mind: Introduction to
Cognitive Science. MA: MIT Press.
Lecture 3: Introduction to the Theory of Dynamical Systems. Phase
space, trajectories, attractors, bifurcations. [html]
Example: The Logistic Map. [html].
Fractals and Fractal dimension. Examples:
Mandelbrot and Julia sets.
[html]
Readings:
- Chaos primer [http://www.societyforchaostheory.org/chaosprimer.pdf]
- Mandelbrodt and Julia sets [http://math.bu.edu/DYSYS/FRACGEOM/FRACGEOM.html]
- Chapter 1: Overview. In Strogatz, S. H.
(1998). Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos.
USA: Westview, Perseus
Books.
- Busemeyer,
J. R. (2002)
Dynamic Systems. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, Nadel, L. (Ed.) Nature. 1, 1039-1049.
- Chapter 9: Lorenz Equations. In Strogatz,
S. H. (1998). Nonlinear Dynamics and
Chaos. USA: Westview, Perseus
Books.
- Software:
- Chapter 11: Fractals. In Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. USA: Westview,
Perseus Books.
- Chapter 12: Strange Attractors.
In Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. USA: Westview,
Perseus Books.
Lecture 1: Neural Networks
and the Dynamical Systems Approach. Recurrent Neural
Networks.
[html]
Readings:
- For ANN basics see Lecture#1[html]
- Chapters 1, 2, 7 and 15 in McLeod, P., Plunkett, K., &
Rolls, E. T. (1998). Introduction to
Connectionist Modelling of Cognitive Processes. UK: Oxford University Press.
- McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An Interactive Activation
Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: Part 1. An Account of Basic
Findings. Psych. Rev. 88, 357.
- Polack, J. (1995). The Induction of dynamical
recognizers.[pdf]
In Port, R. F. & van Gelder, T. (eds.)
(1995). Mind as Motion: Exploration in the Dynamics of Cognition.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lecture 2: Decision making: Multi-alternative Decision Field Theory. [a) html, b) html].
Readings:
- Townsend, J. T., & Busemeyer,
J. (1995). Dynamic Representation of Decision-Making.[pdf]
In Port, R. F. & van Gelder, T. (eds.)
(1995). Mind as Motion: Exploration
in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Roe, R.
M., Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T.
(2001).
Multi-alternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of
decision making. Psychological Review 108,
370-392. [pdf]
- Busemeyer, J. R. & Johnson, J. G. (2004).
Computational models of decision making. To appear in Koehler, D., &
Harvey, N. (Eds.). Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making.
Blackwell Publishing Co. [html]
During the afternoon
sessions, the students will be asked to write short critical essays on the
discussed papers and to present and defend their own ideas on the topics
considered. The final essay should be a generalization of these short essays
and is expected to display the personal position of the students based on the
knowledge acquired during the course.
Maurice Grinberg
Maurice Grinberg is Associate
Professor in the Department of Cognitive Science and Psychology in the New
Bulgarian University.
His research interests are in the field of cognitive modeling, decision making,
cooperation in PD.