| New Bulgarian University > | Center for Cognitive Science > | Summer Schools > | 2002 > | Course Description |
Simplicity as a Fundamental
Cognitive Principle
Nick Chater
Warwick
University
This course
considers the hypothesis that the cognitive system seeks to find the simplest
explanation of perceptual and linguistic input, where simplicity is measured in
terms of code length. This idea has a century-long history in perceptual
psychology, and philosophy of science. Moreover, in the last 35 years, a rich
mathematical theory, Kolmogorov complexity, has developed, with both makes the
approach precise, and shows why simplicity makes sense as an effective
inferential method. Moreover, simplicity underpins a wide range of practical
methods in statistics and AI. This course describes some of these developments,
but focuses on simplicity as a key explanatory construct for understanding
human cognition.
The ‘key readings’ below deal with
some of the issues in the lectures; other issues are new, and have not yet been
discussed in the literature. The discussion in the lectures and especially small
group discussion will go beyond these readings and consider the broader
literature in this area. The course will also discuss new unpublished results,
and work in progress in this field.
1. Cognition and simplicity: An overview
This lecture
gives a general overview of the approach, with examples.
Key Reading
Chater, N. (1999).
The
search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 273-302.
2. Simplicity in perception
Outlines, and argues
for the usefulness of, a simplicity-based account of perception, based on
elementary perceptual phenomena.
Key Reading
Chater, N. (1996).
Reconciling simplicity
and likelihood principles in perceptual organization. Psychological Review, 103,
566-581.
See also readings for Peter van der
Helm’s course at this Summer School.
3. Simplicity in language
Outlines some
new formal results, developed with Paul Vitányi, that show that language
learning is possible, in principle, purely from ‘positive’ evidence. Considers
the viability of this approach as a psychological account.
Key Reading
Chater, N. &
Vitányi, P. (under review).
A simplicity principle for language
acquisition: Re-evaluating what can be learned from positive evidence.
Background
Probabilistic
Models of Grammar: Phonology as Information Minimization, Goldsmith, J. Available at:
http://humanities.uchicago.edu/faculty/goldsmith/
4. Representing and learning about causal
structure
Considers how
causality can be formally represented, using recent breakthroughs in graphical
modelling. Relates this approach to simplicity principle.
Key Reading
Judea Pearl: The art and science of cause
and effect. Epilogue in Pearl J. (2000). Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. Available at:
http://singapore.cs.ucla.edu/LECTURE/lecture_sec1.htm.
5. Simplicity as a fundamental principle
of scientific inference
Considers
general problem of scientific inference, and proposes that existing formal
results indicate that preferring the simplest theory is, in a specific sense,
optimal.
Key Reading
M. Li and P.M.B. Vitanyi, Inductive reasoning and Kolmogorov
complexity, J. Comp. System Sciences, 44:2(1992), 343-384.
Available in
postscript form:http://www.cwi.nl/~paulv/kolmcompl.html
(note a draft of
a new paper by Chater and Vitanyi may be available at the conference)
Small group discussions
Small group
discussion will be responsive to issues emerging from the lectures, but may
include:
1. Limitations/restrictions of
simplicity-based approaches
2. Levels of explanation of cognitive
phenomena
3. Relation to statistical models, rational
analysis, connectionist models
4. Philosophical implications of the
approach
5. Technical discussion of relevant
mathematical issues
6. Further discussion of specific topics in cognition,
in relation to simplicity and related methods.
Assessment
Students who
desire credit can write a 10 page paper describing the viability (or otherwise)
of the simplicity principle, in relation to a research area of their choice,
from any aspect of the cognitive sciences.
Nick Chater
Nick Chater
received an M.A. in Experimental Psychology at Cambridge University, and a PhD
in Cognitive Science at Edinburgh University. He has worked as a lecturer at
University College London, Edinburgh University and Oxford University. He is
currently Professor of Psychology, and Director of the Institute for Applied
Cognitive Science, at Warwick University. He has won three national prizes for
research. His research focuses on mathematical and computational models of
cognition, including reasoning, language processing and perception. He also
works on applying basic cognitive science research to practical problems,
particularly in education and business.
Power Point Presentations:
| Lecture 1 | Lecture 2 | Lecture 3 | Lecture 4 | Lecture 5 |