New Bulgarian University > Center for Cognitive Science > Summer Schools > 2002 > Course Description


Jonas Kaplan Eran Zaidel

 

Hemispheric Specialization and Interhemispheric Interaction in Humans

 

Eran Zaidel & Jonas Kaplan




Department of Psychology, UCLA

 

Abstract  This course will cover hemispheric specialization and interhemispheric interaction from convergent anatomical, physiological and behavioral perspectives, with a focus on the representation and processing of natural language. We will approach the topic from the joint perspectives of the hemisphere-damaged brain, the split brain, and the normal brain. We will argue that the two cerebral hemispheres provide a model system for how different modules of the mind/brain maintain independence sometimes but interact at other times.

 

            General reading:

Zaidel, E., (2001). Brain Asymmetry. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Series Eds.) & R. F. Thompson (Volume Ed.),  International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Vol. 2. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience (pp. 1321-1329). Elsevier: Amsterdam; New York.

 

Lecture 1: The normal brain

1.      Anatomy of the corpus callosum

2.      Lateralized lexical decision

3.      Behavior vs. imaging

4.      Applications: individual differences, Schizophrenia

 

Required readings:     

Aboitiz, F., Scheibel, A. B., Fisher, R. S., & Zaidel, E. (1992). Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum. Brain Research, 598, 143-153.  

Iacoboni, M. & Zaidel, E. (1996).  Hemispheric independence in word recognition:  Evidence from unilateral and bilateral presentations.  Brain and Language, 53, 121-140.

 

        Lecture 2: The split brain  

1.      Disconnection syndrome

2.      Right hemisphere language

3.      Explicit and implicit interhemispheric transfer

 

Required reading:

Zaidel, E., Zaidel, D. W., & Bogen, J. E. (1999). The split brain. In G. Adelman & B. Smith (Eds.).             Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, 2nd Ed (pp. 1930-1936) (also on CD-ROM). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Zaidel, E. (1999). Language in the disconnected right hemisphere. In G. Adelman & B. Smith (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, 2nd Ed (pp. 1930-1936) (also on CD-ROM). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

 

Optional: 

Zaidel, E., Iacoboni, M., Zaidel, D. W., & Bogen, J. (in press).  The callosal syndromes.  In K.M. Heilman & E. Valenstein, E. (Eds.) Clinical Neuropsychology, 4th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

   

Lecture 3: The damaged left hemisphere

           1.      Modularity

            2.      Aphasia

3.      Alexia

 

Required readings:         

  Alexander, M. P. (2000). Aphasia I: Clinical and anatomic issues. In M. J. Farah & T. E. Feinberg (Eds.). Patient-Based Approaches to Cogntive Neuroscience (pp. 165-181). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  

Luzzatti, C. (in press). Optic aphasia and pure alexia: Contribution of callosal disconnection syndromes to the study of lexical and semantic representation in the right hemisphere. In Zaidel, E. & Iacoboni, M., Eds. (in press).  The Parallel Brain: The Cognitive Neuroscience of the Corpus Callosum.  Cambridge: MIT Press. 

 

Lecture 4: The damaged right hemisphere

           

            1. Neglect

            2. Anosognosia

            3. Visuospatial disorders (Balint’s syndrome)

 

Required readings:

Bisiach, E. (1996). Unilateral neglect and the structure of space representation. Current Directions in Psychological Science 5, 2: 62-65.

 

Heilman, K. (1991).  Anosognosia: Possible neuropsychological mechanisms.  In Awareness of Deficit After Brain Injury, G. Prigatano and D. Schacter, eds.  Oxford University Press: New York. Pp. 53-62.

 

Lecture 5: Two hemispheres, one self

 

            1. Self-awareness and brain damage

            2. Self-recognition

            3. Self-monitoring and feedback

            4. Executive functions in the hemispheres

 

Required readings:  

Kaplan, J. & Zaidel, E. (2001).  Error monitoring in the hemispheres: The effect of feedback on lateralized lexical decision. Cognition, 82, 157-178. 

Keenan, J. P., Wheeler, M.A., Gallup, G., and Pascual-Leone, A. (2000).  Self-recognition and the right prefrontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 338-344.

 

Small group sessions

1. Hierarchic perception  

            Reading:

Weekes, N. Y., Carusi, D. & Zaidel, E. (1997) Interhemispheric relations in hierarchical perception: A second look. Neuropsychologia. 

 

        2. Simple reaction time isn’t  

            Reading:

Iacoboni, M., & Zaidel, E., (1995). Channels of the corpus callosum: Evidence from simple reaction times to lateralized flashes in the normal and the split brain. Brain, 118, 779-788.

 

        3.  Does aphasia have advantages?  

            Reading:

Etcoff, N., Ekman, P., Magee, J. & Grank, M. (2000).  Lie detection and language comprehension.  Nature, 405, 139. 

 

        4.   Lateralized object decision experiment.          

            Reading:

    Smith et al. The right hemisphere as an anomaly-detector: Evidence from visual perception

 

        5.   Case studies: Asomatognosia  

Reading:

Feinberg, T. (2001).  Deconstructing the self.  In Altered Egos: How the Brain Creates the Self.  Oxford University Press: New York.  pp. 8-28. 

 

                       Power point presentations

 

 

[ Department ][ Center ][ Research ][ Programs ][ Events ][ Faculty ][ Staff ][ Students ][ Mail ]


Last updated 23/08/2002